Sections 35 & 36 — Evidence room

Sources and Evidence

Every significant statement in this mapping is tied to a publicly accessible source. External sources open in a new browser tab.

Google Patents / WIPO

WO2023077189A1 — System & Method for Expenditure Authorisation and Recordal

Published 2023 · RBMH · Primary (patent record)

View original

RBMH

RBMH corporate website

Current · RBMH · Primary

View original

Intuit Inc.

Intuit corporate website

Current · INTUIT CORPORATE · Primary

View original

Intuit Inc.

Intuit Technology — platform and GenOS architecture

Current · INTUIT AI · Primary

View original

Intuit Inc.

Intuit Investor Relations — SEC filings including FY2025 Form 10-K

FY2025 · SEC · Primary (regulatory)

View original

Intuit Inc. (SEC)

Exhibit 21.01 — Subsidiaries of the Registrant

As of 18 August 2025 · SUBSIDIARIES · Primary (regulatory)

View original

Intuit QuickBooks

QuickBooks Bill Pay — product documentation

Current product documentation · QUICKBOOKS · Primary

View original

Intuit Enterprise Suite

Payments & bill pay automation tools

Current product documentation · QUICKBOOKS · Primary

View original

Credit Karma

Credit Karma consumer platform

Current · CREDIT KARMA · Primary

View original

Intuit Inc.

Intuit QuickBooks adds omni-channel commerce capabilities by acquiring TradeGecko

2020 · ACQUISITIONS · Primary

View original

Intuit Inc.

Intuit acquires OneSaas

2021 · ACQUISITIONS · Primary

View original

USPTO / Google Patents

US8,271,344 B1 — Budget Driven Purchase Monitor (Intuit Inc.)

Granted 2012 · PATENTS · Primary (patent record)

View original

USPTO / Google Patents

US9,824,270 B1 — Self-Learning Receipt OCR Engine (Intuit Inc.)

Granted 2017 · PATENTS · Primary (patent record)

View original

USPTO / Google Patents

US10,366,123 B1 — Template-Free Extraction of Data from Documents (Intuit Inc.)

Granted 2019 · PATENTS · Primary (patent record)

View original

USPTO / Google Patents

US10,915,872 B1 — Automatic Receipt Capture (Intuit Inc.)

Granted 2021 · PATENTS · Primary (patent record)

View original

USPTO / Google Patents

US12,148,047 B2 — Personalized Transaction Categorization (Intuit Inc.)

Granted 2024 · PATENTS · Primary (patent record)

View original

USPTO / Google Patents

US12,148,048 B2 — Framework for Transaction Categorization Personalization (Intuit Inc.)

Granted 2024 · PATENTS · Primary (patent record)

View original

USPTO / Google Patents

US10,521,856 B1 — Categorizing Financial Transactions Based on Spending Patterns

Granted 2019 · PATENTS · Primary (patent record)

View original

USPTO / Google Patents

US11,176,606 B1 — Categorizing Financial Transactions (continuation)

Granted 2021 · PATENTS · Primary (patent record)

View original

USPTO / Google Patents

US9,542,710 B1 — Categorizing Financial Transactions Based on Business Preferences

Granted 2017 · PATENTS · Primary (patent record)

View original

USPTO / Google Patents

US7,966,329 B1 — Recognition and Categorization of Financial Transactions

Granted 2011 · PATENTS · Primary (patent record)

View original

USPTO / Google Patents

US11,276,112 B2 — Transaction Classification Based on Transaction Time Predictions

Granted 2022 · PATENTS · Primary (patent record)

View original

USPTO / Google Patents

US9,882,892 B1 — User Authorization Using Intent Tokens (Intuit Inc.)

Granted 2018 · PATENTS · Primary (patent record)

View original

USPTO / Google Patents

US10,489,865 — Cash-flow forecasting framework lineage (Intuit Inc.)

Granted 2019 · PATENTS · Primary (patent record)

View original

Important notice

This Patent Position Mapping has been prepared from publicly available information for technical, strategic and commercial analysis. References to “overlap”, “proximity”, “intersection” or similar terminology refer to observed similarities or relationships between publicly disclosed technologies and the RBMH patent architecture. They do not constitute a legal opinion regarding patent infringement, validity, enforceability, freedom to operate or claim construction. Any formal determination should be undertaken by appropriately qualified patent counsel following review of the issued or pending claims, prosecution history and relevant prior art.